Reimagining Seller Onboarding for Amazon’s Grocery Category

Reducing seller frustration, increasing compliance clarity, and optimizing internal workflows for faster approvals.

To comply with my non-disclosure agreement, I have omitted and obfuscated confidential information in this case study. The information in this case study is my own and does not necessarily reflect the views of Amazon.

🧩 Project Overview

My Role: UX Researcher
Team: Product Manager, Business Analyst, 2 UX Designers
Timeline: 10 weeks
Tools: Dovetail, Figma, Confluence, Miro
Impact: 22% drop in rejection rateOnboarding time shortened by 3 days35% fewer support tickets post-launch

🚨 The Problem

“I submitted everything you asked—and still got rejected. What am I doing wrong?”

That quote from a seller captured a systemic issue: Amazon’s Grocery category application process was unclear, inconsistent, and inefficient—leading to high seller frustration and internal overhead.

Challenges:
Unclear instructions and document requirements.
Frequent rejections due to avoidable mistakes.
High volume of support interactions

🔍 Research & Discovery

Approach:
Internal stakeholder interviews (compliance, support ops).
15 in-depth seller interviews across three experience levelsProcess audit & customer support ticket review.
Heuristic review of current workflow.

Key Insights:
📄 Sellers didn’t understand which documents were required or why
🔁 Duplicate or re-submitted files were a major friction point
🧑‍💼 Internal teams spent hours manually correcting seller errors

Journey Map of Current Experience

🧭 Problem Reframed:

How might we make the Grocery onboarding workflow more intuitive, transparent, and efficient—without increasing compliance risk?

‍Reduce manual intervention by internal teams.

  • Reduce seller confusion.
  • Increase first-pass approval rates.
  • Reduce manual intervention by internal teams.

4. Business Impact: The improved user experience translated to increased seller engagement and improved conversion rates within the grocery category, positively impacting Amazon's business metrics.

🔍 Research & Discovery

Approach:
Internal stakeholder interviews (compliance, support ops).
15 in-depth seller interviews across three experience levelsProcess audit & customer support ticket review.
Heuristic review of current workflow.

Key Insights:
📄 Sellers didn’t understand which documents were required or why
🔁 Duplicate or re-submitted files were a major friction point
🧑‍💼 Internal teams spent hours manually correcting seller errors

Journey Map of Current Experience

Design Phase:

1. Ideation and Wireframing: Leveraging the insights gained from research, I generated multiple ideas to simplify the application submission process. These ideas were translated into wireframes that captured the new workflow, emphasizing intuitive navigation and clarity.

2. Interactive Prototyping: I transformed wireframes into interactive prototypes using design tools, continuously iterating based on stakeholder feedback and usability testing results.

3. Usability Testing: Prototypes underwent rigorous usability testing involving actual sellers and Amazon associates. Their feedback validated design choices, unveiled any remaining pain points, and ensured a user-friendly experience.

Conclusion:

Through rigorous UX research and design efforts, the project successfully transformed a complex and time-consuming application submission process into an efficient and user-friendly workflow. This redesign not only improved the seller experience but also significantly decreased response times, ultimately enhancing operational efficiency and seller satisfaction within Amazon's ecosystem.